The Similar And Different Regulations On Industrial Designs Between China And Canada/赫子竞

作者:法律资料网 时间:2024-07-22 18:22:32   浏览:8109   来源:法律资料网
下载地址: 点击此处下载
The Similar And Different Regulations
On Industrial Designs
Between China And Canada
He Zijing

Abstract:
With China entering WTO, more and more Chinese industrial designers want to apply internationally to register their designs outside China. This paper shows you the detailed comparison about regulations concerning industrial designs between China and Canada, gives some suggestions about the process to register internationally to protect Chinese applier. Some hints imposed on the difference between the two countries will help to improve our patent law.
KEYWORDS:
Industrial design, China, Canada
1. General introduction on industrial designs
1.1 What is an industrial design?
1.1.1 Of WIPO
An industrial design is the ornamental of aesthetic aspect of an article. The design may consist of three-dimensional features, such as the shape or surface of an article, or of two-dimensional features, such as patterns, lines or color. Industrial designs are applied to a wide variety of products of industry and handicraft. To be protected under most national laws, an industrial design must appeal to the eye. This means that an industrial design is primarily of an aesthetic nature, and does not protect any technical features of the article to which it is applied.
1.1.2 Of CHINA
Design in the Patent Law means any new design of the shape, the pattern or their combination, or the combination of the color with shape or pattern, of a product with creates an aesthetic feeling and it fits for industrial application.
1.1.3 Of CANADA
Design of industrial design means features of shape, configuration, pattern or ornament and any combination of those features that, in a finished article, appeal to and are judged solely by the eye.
1.2 Other forms of Intellectual Property
In China, Intellectual property can be generally classified as patent, copyright, trademark. Patents, or in other words, inventions-creations, mean inventions, utility models and designs. So that the designs are one of the subdivisions of patents.
Whereas, in Canada, in addition to industrial designs, there other forms of intellectual property, as patents, copyrights, and integrated circuit topographies. Hereby, patents cover new inventions (process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter), or any new and useful improvement of an existing invention. So that industrial designs have the equal statues to patents, as one of the subdivisions of intellectual property.
1.3 Why protect industrial designs?
Industrial designs are what make an article attractive and appealing; hence, they add to the commercial value of a product and increase its marketability.
When an industrial design is protected, the owner-the person or entity that has registered the design-is assured an exclusive right against unauthorized copying or imitation of the design by third parties. This helps to ensure a fair return on investment. An effective system of protection also benefits consumers and the public at large, by promoting fair competition and honest trade practices, encouraging creativity, and promoting more aesthetically attractive product.
Protecting industrial designs helps economic development, by encouraging creativity in the industrial and manufacturing sectors, as well as in the traditional arts and crafts. They contribute to the expansion of commercial activities and the export of national products.
Industrial designs can be relatively simple and inexpensive to develop and protect. They are reasonably accessible to small and medium-sized enterprises as well as to individual artists and craftsmen, in both industrialized and developing countries.
1.4 How can industrial designs be protected?
In most countries, an industrial design must be registered in order to be protected under Industrial Design Law. As for China, the regulations on design are under the Patent Law of People’s Republic of China (PRC) and its implementing regulations; As for Canada, The Industrial Design Act and Industrial Design Regulations details the regulations that govern design rights. As a general rule, to be registerable, the design must be “new” or “original”. Different countries have varying definitions of such terms, as well as variations in the registration process itself. Generally, “new” means that no identical or very similar design is known to have existed before.
Depending on the particular national law and the kind of design, an industrial design may also be protected as a work of art under copyright.
2.The main difference concerning registration
2.1 When to file an application
There is no time limit for filing an application as long as the design had never been published. The term “published” means that the design has been made public (even to your neighbors) or offered for commercial sale or use anywhere in the world. It is best to file an quickly as possible if publication has occurred.
In china, an design application does not lose its novelty where, within six months before the date of filing, one of the following events occurred: [1] where it was first exhibited at an international exhibition sponsored of recognized by the Chinese Government;[2]where it was first made public at a prescribed academic or technological meeting;[3]when it was disclosed by any person without the consent of the applicant.
In Canada, the design shall be refused to be registered if the application is filed more than one year after the publication of the design in Canada of somewhere.
2.2 who can apply?
Only the proprietor of a design may apply for and obtain registration for an industrial design both in China and Canada, while there exists little difference between the two countries on the question that who can be defined as proprietor.[1] usually you are considered the proprietor if you have created the design;[2] if you work together with other person to creat a design, you should file for registration as joint proprietors ( unless you are all working under contract or commission );[3] if you have acquired ownership of a design, then you may apply;[4] if you are employee of a company and develop design as part of your employment, then the employer may be the proprietor. In that case, only the employer may apply in Canada; while in china, the entity and the inventor or creator may enter into a contract in which the right to apply for and own the exclusive right is provided for;[5] if you have been hired under contract to develop design for someone else, then that person is the proprietor and is the only one entitled to apply for registration in Canada; whereas in that case in China, the right to apply for registration belongs, unless otherwise agreed upon, to the entity or individual that made the design.
2.3 What requirements to make designs registerable?
In Canada, the minister shall register the design if the minister finds that it is not identical with or dose not so closely resemble any other design already registered as to be confounded therewith, and shall return to the proprietor thereof the drawing or photograph and description with the certificate required.
In China, any design for which patent fight may be granted must not be identical with and similar to any design which, before the date of falling has been publicly disclosed in publications in the country or abroad or has been publicly used in the country, and must not be in conflict with any prior right of any other person.
2.4 What you cannot register?
In Canada, you cannot register the following under the Industrial Design Act: [1] Designs that are utilitarian only and which are not intended to provide visual appeal; [2] Designs that have no fixed appearance; [3] Designs for components that are not clearly visible; [4] a method of construction; [5] an idea; [6] materials used in the construction of an article; [7] the useful function of the article; or [8] color.
In China, for any of the following, no patent right shall be granted: [1] scientific discoveries;[2] rules and methods for mental activities;[3] methods for diagnoses or for the treatment for the diseases;[4] animal and plant varieties;[5] substances obtained by means of nuclear transformation.
From the above regulations, we can see that the Chinese regulations is more generic for all of the three types of creation-inventions; and the Canadian’s is more special in detail on designs. So we should absorb some of them in our implementing regulations of patent law.
2.5 searching of office record prior to filing an application
Prior to filing an application, you may wish to conduct a search of office records in order to better determine whether your design is truly new and original. This will give you the opportunity to see other registered designs. You should also keep your design confidential.
2.6 How long the process takes?
In Canada, the Office dose not register any design until six months after the date of filing. Normally it takes between eight and twelve months to have your application examined. While in china, there is no such kind of provisions concerning the term of process of designs.
2.7 Duration of protection
Both in the two countries, duration of protection of industrial designs is for ten-year term, while the beginning date is quite different. In Canada, it is the date of registration-usually six months after the date of filing; in china, it is the date of filing. Once the ten-year term has expired, anyone is free to make, import, rent or sell etc., the designs.
2.8 Extension of protection
In Canada, your application must include a description which identifies the features that constitute the design since the court may use your description to help determine the limits of protection for your design, you should word your description with care and precision. If your description is too broad, you may over-extend the scope of the design, and it may be impossible to enforce. If it is too narrow, you may limit the scope of the design or leave out features that you intended to protect.
下载地址: 点击此处下载
对人大行使监督权的思考
沈庆中

  要实行依法治国,就必须充分发挥人民代表大会的监督作用。监督“一府两院”的工作,是宪法赋予全国人大和地方各级人大的重要职权。人民法院作为国家的审判机关,接受人大监督是确保正确司法、公正司法的重要前提,这一点是无可置疑的。但在强调人大监督作用的同时,我们也应看到,人大的监督活动既是宪法与法律所规定的一种合法活动,也就应当在宪法与法律允许的范围内以合法的方式进行。遗憾的是,在实践中却出现了一种超越此范围的“监督行为”——个案监督。笔者认为,个案监督存在一些弊端。理由如下:
一、个案监督缺乏宪法依据
  宪法是国家的根本大法,也是处理国家权力机关与审判机关关系的准则。综观我国宪法,并未赋予地方人大及其常委会对地方法院的个案监督权(地方人大组织法与三大诉讼法中也都无人大及其常委会行使个案监督权的依据)。宪法的这一规定是各国通例,绝非疏漏所至。这是人大的特殊地位与职权所决定的。人大作为国家权力机关,并非一个具体的职能部门,其工作就是着眼于总体与宏观方面的事项之决策与贯彻,而非负责具体的事务实施与执行。否则,将体现不出国家权力机关的特点,也必将使之陷于繁杂的具体事务而无法承担其重大的责任。李鹏委员长在九届全国人大常委会第二次会议上的讲话也明确指出:“听取和审议国务院及其有关部门和最高人民法院、最高检察院的工作报告,是人大常委会进行工作监督的基本方式。”笔者认为:首先,人大对两院的监督是一种工作监督;其次,这种监督的基本方式为听取和审议两院的工作报告。
  宪法规定人大对司法机关的监督,主要是宏观监督,应当是从总体上着眼于监督司法机关的工作报告,对认为不合格的法官(包括院长)等提出质询、弹劾、罢免,而不是也无权就司法机关裁判的个案提出强求其改判的意见,并一定要司法机关予以接受。对司法机关的监督只能是间接的,而不能是直接的。这也是世界各国的通例。
  当然,人大在对法院进行工作监督时,有时必然会涉及到一些具体案件,以此说明司法机关在执法中的偏差,但这与将个案监督作为一项专门制度,设立专门职权,设定专门程序是有本质区别的。
二、个案监督违背了独立审判原则
  独立审判的实质,就是司法机关凭自己对法律的理解、对公正标准的认识等依法断案,而不能为任何机关所左右,更不有曲意迎合。如果司法机关在审判时要依据外界的观念进行,或裁判结果可能受到外界有权否定的威胁,何谈独立审判?如此,独立既已不存,公正必受影响。其结果是整个社会的利益——正常的司法制度公正机制被毁。
  个案监督制度,不是对法院判决一般地议论,而是使人大在一定程度上成了“法院之上的法院”,“有权”判定法院裁判的对错,并可据此判定要求人民法院作出处理(一般为改判),这当然是一种越权行为,是一种违背独立审判原则的行为,在实践中就等同于人大可以左右法院的裁判,使得法院无法正常行使审判权。法官必须摆脱实际上可能或者使之有理由感到可能影响案件审判的各种因素。
三、个案监督动摇了司法最终裁判权,破坏了法治的权威
  司法最终裁判权,是世界公认的权威。凡是个案经过司法机关作出生效裁判,便是终审,非经法定程序由有权的司法机关改变,其他任何机关都必须接受,而无权改变。
  法院的权威在很大程度上取决于社会对其判决权威性的普遍接受,无此便无法院的权威,也无法治的权威。因为,若司法机关的生效裁判是可以怀疑的,是可以被他人动摇的,则国家法律权威何在?法治权威何在?个案监督必然导致一些人对法院的不信任心理,也必然诱导一些人利用之否定法院的生效裁判。这不仅动摇了司法最终裁判权,而且也破坏了法治固有的秩序与权威。澳大利亚前首席大法杰勒德·布伦南就认为:“法治取决于甚至可以说等于法院的公信力。摧毁公众对法院的信任,也就毁坏了法治的基础。”1实践也证明,个案监督造成了一部分当事人放弃合法的上诉权的申诉权,而去寻求个案监督之保护的现象。
四、个案监督违背了科学规律,不符合司法工作的特点
  1?司法工作是专业性极强的工作,只有具备一定专业知识的人员才能胜任,而不是一项人人可为的普通工作。而且,它还需要特殊的经验与智慧。目前,法官的职业化正成为一种广泛认同的趋势。
  2?司法工作的首要特点在于程序性,司法公正的本质也在于程序公正。丢弃法定程序去追求公正,是缘木求鱼。我国三大诉讼法对司法机关的办案程序与制度,包括预防裁判失误和失误后的补救都已有了较完善的规定。要保证法律的正确实施,只要严格依法办理即可。个案监督制度,在法定程序之外又去寻找一种“法外程序”来保障公正司法,只会扰乱正常的司法程序。
  3?对具体案件,社会各界难免会有不同的看法,许多看法都可能是司法司法机关相左的,这些相左的意见,当然会有一些来自于各类国家机关(包括人大)。但司法机关只能凭借其自身对法律的理解、对事实的依法判定去断案,这是其职业准则的要求。若因为社会各界有没的看法便可提起个案监督,是无视司法判案行为的特点所产生的违反客观规律的行为。
  4?人大无审判权,也无权判定案件对错,且人大也无法开庭审案。未经法定程序便作出可能为错案的结论,并予以个案监督,其准确性、权威性、合法性都无依据。
  5?个案监督往往演变为律师监督法官。由于人大无足够的专业人才,基本上都是邀请律师参与个案监督,事实上形成了律师监督法官的情形,法官的行为是否合法,判案是否公正,一定程序上由律师判定,这显然是不科学、不合理的。
五、个案监督制度混淆了国家权力机关与具体职能部门的职责,实际上降低了人大的权威。
  依照宪法,我国各个司法机关之间已形成了良好的互相配合、互相制约的关系。开展个案监督,表面上是增强了人大行使职权的刚性,但实际上是将之降低为一个具体的职能部门,损害了其权威。而且这也破坏了制约的科学层次安排,混淆了国家权力机关与对其负责的具体职能部门的职责,会引起国家各种权力运行的混乱。其结果必然会损害国家权力机关在总体、宏观方面职权的行使,因小而失大。可以想象,若真正实行个案监督,人大必然会陷入大量的具体案件而无力胜任。如果人大考虑自身能力,只对少量的案件进行个案监督,又会使得个案监督起不到作用,失去了意义。
六、个案监督不符合效率与经济原则
  这可从以下方面看出:
  1?使人大陷于本不属于其职责范围的具体事务,而削弱其在更重要、全局性的事务中作用的发挥;
  2?将正常的秩序闲置,不仅造成相应的机构、人员、程序制度的浪费,也使问题的解决拖延了时间;
  3?所获得的监督效果与所投入的监督资源之比例不相称,极不经济。法院审理案件,本身要花费大量的人力物力,人大再予以个案监督,实际上是一种反复,产生了大量的无效劳动。何况法院对案件的裁判,依照实体法与程序法进行,有严格的制约机制,应该说基本上都能做到公正、公平,违反实体法或程序法的裁判毕竟是少数。实行个案监督后被确认为错案而改判的案件在实践中仅为极个别。这些案件本可依照法定的审判监督程序解决。可以说,个案监督是对有限的司法资源的严重浪费。
七、个案监督不利于稳定社会关系
  人大进行个案监督,使得已经解决的纠纷再度发生争议,不仅不利于权利义务关系的稳定,也不利于整个社会的安定。这种状况无论是对于权利主体还是社会公众都是不利的。
  综上所述,个案监督制度是在一种错误的观念上设立的一种错误制度。设立个案监督的主要理由不外乎为:司法机关不断有错案发生(这已被不少事实证明),司法工作中确实存在少数人的腐败现象,为了避免错案,杜绝腐败,就要实行个案监督。这种看法陷入了以下误区:
  第一,追求无错案的理想化误区。殊不知,再缜密的法律,再严密的制度,再高素质的法官群体,也无法完全避免错案。
  第二,重实体轻程序的误区。个案监督追求每个案件的公正,实则是追求个案的实体公正。要保障案件的公正,必须依靠严密的法定程序。程序公正是司法公正的首要特征,任何违背程序科学、违反程序规范的行为,有时可能得一时一事之公正,但同时又是对程序公正的极大破坏。个案监督抛弃了法定的程序去另寻途径保障公正,是轻视司法程序的极端表现,是对法治的极大破坏。
  第三,现有司法队伍不可依赖的误区。实行个案监督,前提是显然的,即现有的司法队伍无法做到公正司法,只有借助外部力量去保障司法公正。诚然,在司法队伍中有少数败类,但这是极其个别的。应该肯定,绝大多数司法工作人员都是恪尽职守的,随着司法改革的深入,司法队伍的素质将越来越高。还要看到,任何一个部门、系统都不可能不出问题,不能一出问题便认为不可信任。我们承认司法工作中还有这样或那样的问题,但也要看到,这些问题的存在有其深刻而复杂的社会背景,其原因并非仅在司法机关内部,解决之必须随着改革的深入逐步而行。我们应当正确认识和处理人大与司法机关的关系,充分尊重人民法院不可分割的审判权,准确理解独立审判原则的实质与意义,为公正司法创造一个良好的运行机制与外部环境。
  (作者单位:江西省高级人民法院)
  
  注:
  1见《人民司法》1999年第3期第48—49页。

市政府办关于印发《安顺市招商引资优惠办法(试行)》的通知

贵州省安顺市人民政府办公室


市政府办关于印发《安顺市招商引资优惠办法(试行)》的通知
 


各县、自治县、区人民政府(管委会),市直各部门:

《安顺市招商引资优惠办法(试行)》已经市人民政府同意,现印发给你们,请认真遵照执行。




二〇一一年五月三十一日



安顺市招商引资优惠办法(试行)

第一条 为进一步鼓励和吸引更多的国内外投资者来安顺投资兴业,鼓励和支持更多的城乡居民积极创业,促进我市经济社会又好又快、更好更快发展,根据国家、省有关法规和政策,结合本市实际,制定本办法。

第二条 本优惠办法适用于在安顺市行政区域内注册的市外和境外投资者的投资项目、本市现有企业再投资新建项目及本市城乡居民创业项目。

第三条 用地优惠
(一)投资工业项目用地采取招、拍、挂方式,按国家规定最低出让价出让,并根据项目投资规模、科技含量、社会效益以及是否进入产业园区等因素划分项目类别,确定国有土地出让净收益(土地出让总价款-征地拆迁补偿-税费-上缴省级部分,下同)的不同比例,由受益财政等额列支奖励给企业,用于支持项目建设(见表一)。

表一:投资工业项目用地优惠标准表
项目类别 按固定资产投资额度确定
国有土地出让净收益奖励比例 按标准厂房建筑面积确定
国有土地出让净收益奖励比例
1千万元至
5千万元 5千万元以上 1万平方米至
2万平方米 2万平方米以上
产业园区一般工业项目 70% 100%
产业园区外一般工业项目 50% 80%
高新技术工业项目 80% 100%
国内500强企业投资工业项目 100% 100%
世界500强企业投资工业项目 100% 100%
产业园区标准化厂房项目 80% 100%



(二)投资旅游业、商贸物流业项目用地采取招、拍、挂方式,根据项目投资规模确定国有土地出让净收益的不同比例,由受益财政等额列支奖励给企业,用于支持项目建设(分别见表二、表三)。

表二:投资旅游业项目用地优惠标准表
项目类别 按固定资产投资额度确定国有土地出让净收益奖励比例
1千万元至1亿元 1亿元至2亿元 2亿元以上
旅游业项目 30% 50% 70%


表三:投资商贸物流业项目用地优惠标准表
项目类别 按固定资产投资额度确定国有土地出让净收益奖励比例
1亿元至2亿元 2亿元至5亿元 5亿元以上
商贸物流业项目 30% 50% 70%



第四条 财政扶持
(一)新建工业生产性项目、产业园区标准化厂房项目,从纳税年度起五年内,企业所得税、增值税、城镇土地使用税市及县区留成部分按相应比例由受益财政等额列支奖励给企业,用于支持项目建设(见表四)。我市现有企业在投资新建、扩建的工业项目,对照相应的项目类别奖励比例,第三至五年每年增加10%的奖励。
(二)对工业企业提供担保、贷款占其贷款总额50%以上的担保公司、小额贷款公司,年度实缴企业所得税市及县区留成部分50%由受益财政等额列支奖励给担保公司、小额贷款公司。

表四:投资工业项目以税计奖扶持标准表
项目类别 纳税年度
第一年 第二年 第三年 第四年 第五年
产业园区一般工业项目 100% 100% 60% 60% 60%
产业园区外一般工业项目 100% 100% 50% 50% 50%
高新技术工业项目 100% 100% 70% 70% 70%
国内500强企业投资工业项目 100% 100% 80% 80% 80%
世界500强企业投资工业项目 100% 100% 80% 80% 80%
产业园区标准化厂房项目 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
现有企业再投资新建工业项目 +10% +10% +10%


(三)对租用产业园区标准化厂房、进入国家级、省级科技企业孵化器或中小企业创业孵化中心的工业生产性项目,从投产之日起,由受益财政每年按一定比例给予企业租金补贴,连续补助三年(见表五)。

表五:产业园区工业企业租金补贴标准表
项目类别 年度租金补贴比例
第一年 第二年 第三年
租用普通标准化厂房工业生产性项目 60% 40% 20%
进入科技企业孵化器、中小企业创业孵化中心的工业生产性项目 80% 60% 40%


第五条 收费优惠
(一)凡在我市投资新办企业(房地产类除外)的过程中,所涉及《贵州省行政事业性收费项目录》中的收费项目,除法律、法规规定不能减免外,属国家和省明确规定上缴的行政事业性收费一律按收费标准下限收取;市及县区可支配的行政事业性收费,执收单位是财政全额拨款的单位收费全免,是差额拨款的单位按收费标准下限减半收取,是自收自支的单位收费标准按下限收取。企业投产或开始经营后2年内,市及县区可支配的行政事业性收费,执收单位是财政全额拨款的单位收费减半。
(二) 对进入工业园区的工业项目实行零收费,需上交省级以上的收费,由受益财政等额列支补贴给企业。

第六条 重大项目优惠
对投资规模达2亿元以上的市重点鼓励发展产业项目,可采取一事一议、一企一策的办法,给予更为优惠的扶持政策。

第七条 优惠政策兑现
(一)兑现优惠政策产生的财政支出,由市、县(区)两级财政按受益比例负担,县(区)财政先行兑付,市级财政负担部分通过财政结算渠道拨付县(区)财政。
(二)市及各县(区)成立招商引资优惠办法落实审核工作组,成员单位由招商工作部门、优化发展环境督查办公室、发展改革委、财政局、审计局、监察局、工信委(经贸局)组成。本办法所规定的优惠条款,由投资企业向所在县(区)政府(管委会)申请,县(区)招商引资优惠办法落实审核工作组进行初审后,报县(区)政府(管委会)审定后兑现。
(三)招商引资优惠办法落实审核工作组负责督查落实优惠办法的兑现。

第八条 本办法由市商务(招商)行政主管部门负责解释。

第九条 本办法自发布之日起执行,《安顺市招商引资鼓励办法》及其他与本办法有重复规定的政策自行废止。